Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   cvs commit: src/sys/net if_vlan.c
Message-ID:  <200307071845.h67Ij1N1016542@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200307060324.h663OPYE087830@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200307060324.h663OPYE087830@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:24:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.org> said:

>     I'm not quite sure what the right thing is to do here. Neither the
>     vlan(4) nor ifconfig(8) man pages suggest which way to go. For now,
>     I've removed this use of EVL_VLANOFTAG() so that the tag will match
>     correctly in all cases. I will not get upset if somebody makes a
>     compelling argument for using EVL_VLANOFTAG() everywhere instead,
>     as long as the use is consistent.
  
VLAN tags have only 12 bits.  Anything else is part of the 802.1p
encapsulation header (either the priority or the ``this packet was
translated from Token Ring'' bit).

-GAWollman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307071845.h67Ij1N1016542>