Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 From: "Mark Lu" <excelblue@gmail.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? Message-ID: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the reasons or rationale behind this. Even today, sysinstall seems to work extremely well as an easy-to-use, simple, and stable tool for the installation of FreeBSD. None of the features seem limiting or outdated to me. So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old if it works, right? -- Mark Lu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950>