Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:28:39 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> To: Kyle Evans <self@kyle-evans.net> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358870 - stable/12/usr.sbin/services_mkdb Message-ID: <3d419683-5690-b316-ac68-1dd02a8582f0@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaFoMd4u8S9U3Zd7NoQB0oiGrsG1TVgoEeQoLpNaG1LjsQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <202003110545.02B5jXvV068254@repo.freebsd.org> <CACNAnaFoMd4u8S9U3Zd7NoQB0oiGrsG1TVgoEeQoLpNaG1LjsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/03/2020 07:50, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:45 AM Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Author: pfg >> Date: Wed Mar 11 05:45:33 2020 >> New Revision: 358870 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358870 >> >> Log: >> MFC r358154 (by delphij) >> Bump PROTOMAX: this matches the value on NetBSD and will be necessary for >> future updates. >> >> MFC r r358448; >> /etc/services: attempt to bring the database to this century. >> >> This is the result of splitting r358153 in two, in order to avoid a build >> system bug and being able to merge the change to previous releases.. >> >> Document better this file, updating the URL to the IANA registry and closely >> match the official services. >> >> For system ports (0 to 1023) we now try to follow the registry closely, noting >> some historical differences where applicable. >> >> As a side effect: drop references to unofficial Kerberos IV which was EOL'ed >> on Oct 2006[1]. While it is conceivable some people may still use it in some >> very old FreeBSD machines that can't be replaced easily, the use of it is >> considered a security risk. Also drop the unofficial netatalk, which we >> supported long ago in the kernel but was dropped long ago. >> >> Leave for now smtps, even though it conflicts with IANA's submissions. >> The change should have very little visibility, if any, but should be a >> step closer to the current IANA database. >> >> [1] https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb4-end-of-life.html >> > > r358154 at the very least should still go back to stable/11 if there's > going to be a later change to /etc/services that will still require > it. Yes (I am just a bit busy ATM), but it goes a bit further, it has to make it into a release before I can commit the update in -current or we'll break some CI builds. Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3d419683-5690-b316-ac68-1dd02a8582f0>