Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:50:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys protosw.h src/sys/netinet ipprotosw.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108101648130.86758-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20010810162507.A27506@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
certainly not! I plan to rip out the varargs that are already there. (if I can) what a horrible idea.. "Hey let's allow different protocols going through the same switch table, to use differnt argument lists! That way we'll get strange unreporducable bugs whe people hook protocols together in unexpected ways, and all have jbs for life!" On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 04:17:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Discover that we now have two version sof the same structure. > > I will shoot one of them shortly when I figure out why someone thinks > > they need it. (And I can prove they don't) > > (netinet/ipprotosw.h should GO AWAY) > > Are you planning to follow NetBSD's lead and convert protosw to use > varargs functions? That would reduce diffs for gif and other devices we > share via KAME. > > -- Brooks > > -- > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108101648130.86758-100000>