Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:57:10 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: choosing ACLs Message-ID: <444nh89u09.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <20768.56466.778249.416668@jerusalem.litteratus.org> (Robert Huff's message of "Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:35:14 -0500") References: <20768.56466.778249.416668@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> writes: > "man tunefs" mentions two types of ACLs: POSIX.1e and NFSv4. > Am I correct in assuming an unqualified "ACL" in general usage > defaults to the former, not the latter? Nearly all ACL functionality is implemented in a single module, with NFS ACLs being one of several "extensions" to the POSIX kind. I'd estimate that most unqualified references actually apply to any ACLs at all, but your assumption probably won't steer you all that far wrong. I apologize for being a little non-commital here; I'm working on a small screen and looking at code is inconvenient here.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444nh89u09.fsf>