Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:56:29 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220241 - in stable/8/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <20110724185629.GD17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1107241447460.7526@multics.mit.edu> References: <201104011250.p31CoULd045353@svn.freebsd.org> <CAK2BMK6OrJ52jMNi8oJeAEyBAHj0AFMFRdjhUaYPZsWka7A75g@mail.gmail.com> <20110724184404.GB17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1107241447460.7526@multics.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VQzZ2Dp9L8/8MSeh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > >On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 01:04:28PM -0400, Ben Kaduk wrote: > >>[replying to -fs since that is where the original discussion of adding > >>O_CLOEXEC occurred] > >> > >>On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>= =20 > >>wrote: > >>>Author: kib > >>>Date: Fri Apr =9A1 12:50:29 2011 > >>>New Revision: 220241 > >>>URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220241 > >>> > >>>Log: > >>>MFC r219999: > >>>Add O_CLOEXEC flag to open(2) and fhopen(2). > >> > >>I saw mail go by on debian-bsd@lists.debian.org that the are going to > >>pick up on these O_CLOEXEC definitions and export them, which included > >>the comment: > >>No O_SEARCH yet, since FreeBSD doesn't seem to implement it. > >What do you mean by exporting them ? >=20 > Per http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/07/msg00299.html , it is not= =20 > possible for them to use our sys/fcntl.h directly, so its contents must b= e=20 > copied into a bits/fcntl.h that enters somehow into their framework. (I= =20 > am not familiar with how this framework works.) >=20 > > > >> > >>Would there be any reason for us to support O_SEARCH? > >>http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html > >>does not make it very clear to me whether we would want to.... > > > >We do not support O_SEARCH because nobody implemented it yet. >=20 > Sure, but is it worth filing a PR as a reminder? Without the patch ? No. --VQzZ2Dp9L8/8MSeh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4satwACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iAJgCfXlGHKhvX+8OHOcvJZsGF/Wqn PHMAoKrjfb0EBUZuGCRwSN7vvrLciS8B =LZvF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VQzZ2Dp9L8/8MSeh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110724185629.GD17489>