Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:28:13 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu Subject: Re: Anoncvs support (was Re: NO MORE '-BETA') Message-ID: <200103191728.f2JHSDK04523@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20010319081846.A61859@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> References: <20010318161849.A20382@dragon.nuxi.com> <200103190128.SAA20941@usr05.primenet.com> <20010319003213.A25641@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010319081846.A61859@ohm.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20010319081846.A61859@ohm.physics.purdue.edu>, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:32:13AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > CVSup's checkout mode has been around longer than FreeBSD has offered > > anoncvs service. > > A service which, IMO, is still not very well supported. That's probably > one reason why it's hard to get new developers (not everyone feels like > syncing the entire repo). But then again, I wonder how much load there > is on anoncvs.freebsd.org. Still, would be nice to have more than one > anoncvs server, since not everyone's in the U.S.A. Would you like to take over maintainership of the anoncvs services? It somehow got dropped in my lap, and it is certainly not something I ever wanted to be responsible for. I am too busy already taking care of the CVSup mirrors. It is extremely hard to support more than just a few simultaneous anoncvs clients at once on one server. You need screaming fast hardware and a monstrous RAM disk just to handle 4-6 of them. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103191728.f2JHSDK04523>