Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 00:53:02 +1000 From: Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dreadful gmirror performance - suggested changes to 'prefer' Message-ID: <482313CE.8000805@modulus.org> In-Reply-To: <fvuse6$n5h$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <E1Ju4Qm-0005iL-7C@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <fvuse6$n5h$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I havent looked at the code in detail, but I can't see that it would be too > difficult. What do people think ? If the first drive is always priority=0, then it is going to be stuck at the highest priority, or under your plan, the lower priority. My original idea OTOH (starting the counting at 100) solves the problem with aone-line patch. Call me biased but this is what I prefer :-) - Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?482313CE.8000805>