Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 13:07:05 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP kernels... how many processes can be in ? Message-ID: <199807272007.NAA01087@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Jul 1998 15:57:43 EDT." <199807271957.PAA14638@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Mon, 27 Jul 1998 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> said: > > > 2/ sticking some 'MT_RIGHTS' or > > 'MT_CONTROL' mbufs can be added on the head or end of the packet, and used > > to hold this info. (encoded like tcp options.. 1 byte type, 1 byte len, > > data.) > > Gross! Please don't do this! We have too much code that depends on > mbuf chaining as it is! Ok, so we know what's "bad". Any suggestions on "less bad"? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807272007.NAA01087>