Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:50:59 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Terry Glanfield <terry@program-products.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SKIP and NAT, I got it. Message-ID: <199903190050.AAA02876@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "18 Mar 1999 22:52:46 GMT." <ek8wefm0x.fsf@program-products.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> brian@Awfulhak.org (Brian Somers) writes:
> > I've never used skip, but I would imagine that it should reduce the
> > interface mtu by ~128 bytes so that it has room to encapsulate the
> > data (does skip encrypt too ? If so, it'll probably need a few
> > bytes more than 128).
> >
> > Is this happening ?
>
> Yep. 134 bytes.
What happens if you HUP natd after SKIP has tweaked the MTU ?
In theory, the MTU change should be noticed by natd (assuming you're
using -dynamic), but if it's not, the HUP should make it look again.
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org> <brian@OpenBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903190050.AAA02876>