Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251716] devel/tkcvs: move to devel/tkrcs && update to 9.4.0 Message-ID: <bug-251716-7788-buatJ5m4mU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251716-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251716-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251716 --- Comment #5 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #4) I'm sorry. I should have really waited to finish my coffee before making my last reply -- I know better :-( More accurately; I saw an apparent need for a name change for this port, as it continued to gain additional RCS support; now up to CVS, GIT, RCS and SVN. TkCVS no longer seemed to cut it. I gave it some thought, and decided that TkRCS really seemed to hit the target. I made/tested the changes required to make the change, and found all was well. Before submitting a patch upstream. I decided I should really take the time to remove the cruft I discovered while making my initial changes. This turned into a rabbit hole, which took much longer than I imagined, as there was clearly quite a bit of (bad) copy/past(ing), as well as platform dependent nonsense that crept in. After completion, I whipped up a diff, and sent it along for consideration. She indicated had no issue with a name change, and that's where it stands. As to "bogus" version; This is the version I chose, and also a part of the patch I submitted upstream. I picked the number, as it provided enough "points" to cover potential updates to TkCVS. Thanks for your continued time, and effort with this. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251716-7788-buatJ5m4mU>