Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:03:19 -0400
From:      Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/cd Makefile cd.sh src/usr.bin/command Makefile command.sh
Message-ID:  <20020717170319.GA39278@netmonger.net>
In-Reply-To: <200207162113.g6GLDBBE081559@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200207162113.g6GLDBBE081559@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:13:11PM -0700, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> wollman     2002/07/16 14:13:11 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     usr.bin              Makefile 
>   Added files:
>     usr.bin/cd           Makefile cd.sh 
>     usr.bin/command      Makefile command.sh 
>   Log:
>   POSIX requires these shell builtins to also exist as totally pointless
>   external commands.  Since they serve no useful purpose, it's OK that their
>   implementation is not the most efficient possible.

Is it legal for them to print a warning or something when they're run?
I'm imagining similar confusion as when first-year CS students name
their programs "test".  Someone somewhere will write "/usr/bin/cd foo"
in a script and go nuts trying to figure it out.
-- 
Christopher Masto

CB461C61 8AFC E3A8 7CE5 9023 B35D  C26A D849 1F6E CB46 1C61

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020717170319.GA39278>