Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:59:57 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net> Cc: Adam Lofstedt <adaml@visimation.com>, "'freebsd-questions'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Problem with my startup script? Message-ID: <20021219215957.GB598@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20021219154527.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net> References: <002001c2a77f$f40db760$6f00000a@5adam5> <002001c2a77f$f40db760$6f00000a@5adam5> <3.0.5.32.20021219154527.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-12-19 15:45, "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net> wrote: > At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> Local Package Initialization : (skipping smbfsstartup.sh, not > >> executable). > > > >Quick fix: > > > > # chmod 0750 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh > > Pardon moir for chiming in here, but I have noticed 3 different posts about > the proper chmod for the executable on this thread: 744, 755 and now 750 > .....I've typically used 755, but if there is some reason for the others as > a preference I would be interested in the reasons. or when one should be > used over the other... The more conservative, the better, I guess. The `correct' permission set is the one that fits the local policies. I arbitrarily chose to give read, write & execute permission to the owner of the file, read & execute to the group and nothing to everyone else. It was just that, an arbitrary choise. There isn't an objectively `correct for everyone' set of permissions. Giorgos. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021219215957.GB598>