Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:00:42 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, "perl@FreeBSD.org" <perl@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/171084: [PATCH] shells/p5-Shell-Perl: update to 0.0022 Message-ID: <12422CCB-40CD-4D2C-A137-CB0F0BF9CB69@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <503A794B.6060806@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208261840.q7QIe2nV047178@freefall.freebsd.org> <503A6F41.7070205@FreeBSD.org> <503A6FF9.5000207@FreeBSD.org> <503A70A7.30903@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838o9B7yrHYJOZeQ-UzLnLf9NAMXWoit36BALW8mLfU%2BBA@mail.gmail.com> <503A794B.6060806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 26, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > The problem seems to be with the gnats auto-assigner: >=20 > "^p5-" =3D> "perl", Did my previous message not come through? In case it didn't, here's the key p= art again: The flood of email to perl@ is an unfortunate side effect of the fact that t= hese auto assigner doesn't recognize that it could assign these to me becaus= e the "p5- -> perl@" rule takes precedence over the "submitters is committer= " rule. This is something I'm trying to work on. > Can we change that to be a list of ports that perl@ maintains? I think the list might be too large and slow the auto assigner down. Also, i= t would require maintenance. And the ports that I'm submitting PRs for aren'= t maintained by perl@. > The alternative would be to set up a perl-bugs@ list. I think fixing the auto assigner is the better solution. Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12422CCB-40CD-4D2C-A137-CB0F0BF9CB69>