Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:39:05 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> To: Jesus Monroy <jesus.monroy@usa.net> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is the policy for builtin shell functions? Message-ID: <19990630203904.A68144@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <19990629194802.14484.qmail@www0w.netaddress.usa.net>; from Jesus Monroy on Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 12:48:02PM -0700 References: <19990629194802.14484.qmail@www0w.netaddress.usa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Jesus Monroy wrote:
> I've note many builtin functions for csh(1) and sh(1)
> have no apropos(1) or whatis(1).
>
> Especially annoying are 'limit' and 'unlimit'.
Couldn't agree more. Please file a PR about this. One that includes
patches would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990630203904.A68144>