Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:01:09 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, tim@bishnet.net Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/dnetc-alpha Makefile distinfo ports/misc/dnetc-sparc64 Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <1086253268.96671.12.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040603012247.GC714@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200406021651.i52Gpj5O006355@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040603012247.GC714@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
V čt, 03. 06. 2004 v 03:22, Kris Kennaway píše:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:51:45AM -0700, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav 2004/06/02 09:51:45 PDT
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > misc Makefile
> > Added files:
> > misc/dnetc-alpha Makefile distinfo
> > misc/dnetc-sparc64 Makefile distinfo
> > Log:
> > Add slave ports for dnetc-alpha and dnetc-sparc64. Reason to use slave
> > ports is that different architectures have different version numbers
> > of binaries.
>
> That shouldn't be a problem, and there's already precedent for this
> (perforce, which also somewhat bogusly does not set a version number
> on architectures which are unsupported). Adding multiple ports causes
> index collisions anyway.
Hmm, perforce, hmm. Tim, could you look at perforce ports for
inspiration? :)
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some
watery tart threw a sword at you.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBAvujUntdYP8FOsoIRAgLaAKCmlaGDzIuE/o6axEhf9vc8fO38xwCfYWhc
JuIJAGO1/6uf2bJwiEJ63Lk=
=r40Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1086253268.96671.12.camel>