Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:15:34 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add inverse option to ministat Message-ID: <20150715071534.GE8523@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <77609.1436942964@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20150715002013.GZ8523@funkthat.com> <77609.1436942964@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote this message on Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 06:49 +0000:
> --------
> In message <20150715002013.GZ8523@funkthat.com>, John-Mark Gurney writes:
>
> >Instead of having to massage the data, or know that below a certain
> >percentage you can just flip the sign, provide this, and you'll now
> >convert to x per second, giving you an easier comparision for talking.
>
> Why isn't this fundamentally against the UNIX and Software Tools Philosphy
> and the first step on a long road to turn ministat into R ?
Didn't that get violated when options -C and -d were added in r161692?
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150715071534.GE8523>