Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:38:05 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Newbie upgrade question... Message-ID: <20000410183805.A23077@orion.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <PCEHKHHDDCJMAMJLBLNCIEILCBAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>; from pahowes@fair-ware.com on Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:25:54PM -0400 References: <PCEHKHHDDCJMAMJLBLNCIEILCBAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:25:54PM -0400, Paul A. Howes wrote: > All- > > For a while, I tracked 3.4-STABLE using the RELENG_3_4_0_RELEASE tag in my > supfile. When I decided to make the move to 4.0, I used > RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE instead. After the update completed, I checked > /usr/src/UPDATING for the 3.4 -> 4.0 "recipe" that has been publicized on > this list. In a previous post to this list, Eric Ogren stated that the > kernel should be built with "make buildkernel KERNEL=GENERIC". I do not see > this anywhere in the UPDATING file. Rather, mine would have me build the > kernel with the old "config GENERIC ; cd ../../compile/GENERIC ; make depend > && make" at this point > > This leads me to the obvious question: Am I using the right branch name/tag > in my supfile, or is the corrected version of UPDATING on CURRENT? No. RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE is 4.0-RELEASE a snapshop of the branch you want: RELENG_4. Once the CD's are rolled, nothing tagged with RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE (or similar) changes. There isn't really any point in downloading one of the _RELEASE tags since that's what's on the CD and ftp site in binary form. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000410183805.A23077>