Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:56:29 -0400 From: "Gray, David W." <David_W_Gray@tvratings.com> To: "'FreeBSD Current list'" <FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org> Subject: FW: Recent make world breakages Message-ID: <01D4D419B1A4D111A30400805FE65B13070ABF77@nmrusdunsx1.nielsenmedia.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Blasted Outhouse mailer. <Grumble> Lets try again. -----Original Message----- From: Gray, David W. Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:15 AM To: 'FreeBSD Current list' Subject: Recent make world breakages Not to exacerbate a sore subject, but... >From what I'm seeing go by, the intention is that a current make world is supposed to work from -stable. OK, what about make release? The reason I am asking, is that I'm actually running current on a laptop, and for various reasons, its far easier to be able to load it from a cdrom. My build machine is a 4.0 release box, its the only one I have that's muscular enough to do the build. Since I've been tracking -current (the last couple of weeks or so, but I've been on this list for a year or so) I have been able to build world, but building the boot crunch dies compiling /bin/sh (there are intermediate files created by yacc and such that are built in the current directory, not where the source is.) Should this work? Is it germane that I don't build in /usr/<whatever>, but over in /home/current, etc? Should this work? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01D4D419B1A4D111A30400805FE65B13070ABF77>