Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:24:05 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Large Capsicum patch for review. Message-ID: <86y5eb9sbe.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20130226121345.GB1341@garage.freebsd.pl> (Pawel Jakub Dawidek's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:13:46 %2B0100") References: <20130213025547.GA2025@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130213230221.GB1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130223221116.GR1377@garage.freebsd.pl> <5129ADC5.5040306@gmx.de> <512A2CA0.2050509@gmx.de> <20130224235936.GX1377@garage.freebsd.pl> <512B3DBB.4080909@gmx.de> <20130225215004.GA1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <867glvbbjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20130226121345.GB1341@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > [...] I use int as a more CPU-friendly type [than size_t] > > [...] size_t is equal to unsigned long on all platforms, so > > "CPU-friendly" is not a valid argument. > Is long more CPU-friendly than int? No, but it isn't any *less* CPU-friendly either, so this is not a valid argument for choosing unsigned int over size_t. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y5eb9sbe.fsf>