Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:19:58 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org> Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, gerzo@micronet.sk, cvs-all@freebsd.org, danger@freebsd.org, max@love2party.net, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en about.sgml Message-ID: <20061108081958.GB833@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20061108012656.717bba8e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <200611071654.kA7GsWbj097708@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061107185552.GD83597@submonkey.net> <200611072054.30906.max@love2party.net> <947574552.20061107211608@micronet.sk> <20061107222044.GJ83597@submonkey.net> <20061108012656.717bba8e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-Nov-08 01:26:56 -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: >On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:20:45 +0000 >Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote: =2E.. >> > I'm confused too, it sounds with "are" better to me, but I might be >> > wrong. English fluents around, please step up and tell us what's the >> > correct form of this sentence? >>=20 >> I am a native speaker :) > >You call that English, gov? She'll be right, mate. I'd personally agree with Ceri that "is" is technically correct. "are" does sound better. --=20 Peter Jeremy --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFUZMu/opHv/APuIcRAnhOAKDC2gzKwG2bOfysLu+Jifmp+SjG4wCfXJ85 a3VeB2110Uqqfn00nFQwYOw= =igQL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061108081958.GB833>