Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Aug 1998 15:33:33 +0800
From:      Craig Beasland <craig@hotmix.com.au>
To:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: NT vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <002e01bdcf31$1b3f6ad0$0a1e21cb@superbruce.hotmix.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <19980821141844.16052.qmail@wolf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I seem to be misunderstood, my preference would be to use BSD for
everything.  It supports, dial-in users, file and printer sharing and all
the Internet stuff as well all with much lower overheads and older hardware.

However, a person coming from a completely MS background would have a hard
time getting BSD working with a web server.  Just the partitioning and
labelling of the drives seems to get most people.  Point and click might not
be the best, but it sure is easy.

Also, a well built NT box is more secure than a poorly built BSD one -
wouldn't you agree.

Cheers
Craig


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002e01bdcf31$1b3f6ad0$0a1e21cb>