Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:48:54 +0400 From: "Marat N.Afanasyev" <amarat@ksu.ru> To: Daniil Cherednik <dcherednik@masterhost.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.2 + apache == a LOT of sigprocmask Message-ID: <4EC22776.1080204@ksu.ru> In-Reply-To: <4EC22380.20509@masterhost.ru> References: <4EC17AAF.9050807@FreeBSD.org> <201111141556.13295.jhb@freebsd.org> <4EC18F28.20307@FreeBSD.org> <4EC22380.20509@masterhost.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080807090208090905000907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniil Cherednik wrote: > After all that I was trying to compare perfomance of return from fork()= > in Linux and FreeBSD (see > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-October/036705.= html) > and fork() in FreeBSD was slower. our fork() differs from linux fork() in handling parent and child memory = pages, and ours is generally slower, that's why sphinxsearch (prior to=20 1.1 with its prefork model) was unusable on FreeBSD under moderate and=20 heavy load, too many forks %) --=20 SY, Marat --------------ms080807090208090905000907--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EC22776.1080204>