Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:40:00 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way Message-ID: <20040928174000.GF18611@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040928153537.GA3185@frontfree.net> References: <20040927224353.845381B217@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928043351.GA2400@frontfree.net> <20040928071758.GB14942@ip.net.ua> <m31xgmzt34.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928153537.GA3185@frontfree.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:35:37PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's > patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have > INSTALL=install -S in their make.conf. > > What do you think about this? > My patch does this for "precious" shared libraries. And yes, putting "INSTALL=install -S" is what I had in mind when suggesting to test installworld times. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWaHwqRfpzJluFF4RAvwiAJ97NuZkfxatIwIirb+a3yIxJlG3ogCfVve4 QBui2MjQJOGt0wJjfwU42sg= =a4xI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928174000.GF18611>