Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:40:00 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way
Message-ID:  <20040928174000.GF18611@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20040928153537.GA3185@frontfree.net>
References:  <20040927224353.845381B217@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928043351.GA2400@frontfree.net> <20040928071758.GB14942@ip.net.ua> <m31xgmzt34.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928153537.GA3185@frontfree.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tmoQ0UElFV5VgXgH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:35:37PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's
> patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have
> INSTALL=3Dinstall -S in their make.conf.
>=20
> What do you think about this?
>=20
My patch does this for "precious" shared libraries.  And yes, putting
"INSTALL=3Dinstall -S" is what I had in mind when suggesting to test
installworld times.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--tmoQ0UElFV5VgXgH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBWaHwqRfpzJluFF4RAvwiAJ97NuZkfxatIwIirb+a3yIxJlG3ogCfVve4
QBui2MjQJOGt0wJjfwU42sg=
=a4xI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tmoQ0UElFV5VgXgH--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928174000.GF18611>