Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:12:54 -0700 From: Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r191255 - in head/sys: amd64/conf conf i386/conf net Message-ID: <3c1674c90906091012u26b0e823q57a7ea1f42eef22d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090609143729.R22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200904190016.n3J0G4rA090911@svn.freebsd.org> <20090609143729.R22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think FLOWTABLE does nto belong into DEFAULTS. =A0Really DEFAULTS was > meant for "You cannot boot without this" and if people start to weaken > it, DEFAULTS will soon be the new GENERIC. =A0That said I am not sure it > belongs to GENERIC either. I can either push it in to GENERIC or I can change it to NOFLOWTABLE. If you want to remove it from GENERIC then we're going to have to have a lengthy discussion about what most FreeBSD users actually use and gut GENERIC as it stands now. The fact is, most FreeBSD users have sufficiently few peers that flowtable is a win over using the routing table on every lookup. Thanks, Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3c1674c90906091012u26b0e823q57a7ea1f42eef22d>