Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:49:29 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg@evilcode.net> Subject: Re: pgbench performance is lagging compared to Linux and DragonflyBSD? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211071549090.5942@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <50997AB8.40607@rawbw.com> References: <50980ADD.4010402@rawbw.com> <CAGH67wScvnE7gYzVVtfehYbVfM465vrLjP9bX4KXSp8Sq-25mA@mail.gmail.com> <50994FE0.2070205@rawbw.com> <CANY-Wm9nTPy5A3Eygb4BQmz60a8ose--3veoQHwFj3p66BFB8Q@mail.gmail.com> <50997AB8.40607@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Yuri wrote: > On 11/06/2012 11:10, Samuel J. Greear wrote: >> Single and multi-socket hardware are not really directly comparable in >> PostgreSQL tests. > > So if the CPUs are split between sockets, would such system generally perform > better or worse with PostgeSQL vs. non-split situation? > multiple sockets means more interconnect delay=lower performance.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1211071549090.5942>