Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 18:12:20 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se> Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert still broken? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970506181119.4479l-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199705060743.JAA25044@ocean.campus.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 May 1997, Mikael Karpberg wrote: > According to Archie Cobbs: > [...] > > > So the choices are: > > > deny : be silent > > > reject: send ICMP !H > > > reset : send RST > > > Yeah, I think that's good. > That way you can configure it as you like. Flexability is (almost) always > a good thing. > > Would it be hard to add something like "netreject", which would send !N, too? That would be nice. I didn't suggest it only because I couldn't think of an appropriate keyword :-) Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970506181119.4479l-100000>