Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:04:16 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: "pyunyh@gmail.com" <pyunyh@gmail.com>, David Christensen <davidch@broadcom.com>, Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@freebsd.org>, Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>, "davidch@freebsd.org" <davidch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bce(4) with IPMI Message-ID: <201110181304.16746.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1318362745.2724.22.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1318018310.27029.10.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <20111011181219.GB5661@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <1318362745.2724.22.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:52:25 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > In addition, the IPMI driver attaches to "something" and I can poke at > it via ipmitool. So, from the driver perspective, the attempt to detect > MFW enabled doesn't work as the chipset still thinks that its "on". The ipmi driver attaching to the BMC is independent. You can have the BMC active even though it's network channel is unavailable, so I wouldn't count on that datapoint being meaningful. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201110181304.16746.jhb>