Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:38:41 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: "Scott I. Remick" <scott@sremick.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports Message-ID: <20040115173841.GA30502@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1nq7eb2w5om4b.1g5kxxnyp5cot$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <1lwz10b51pvyx$.iwa53nx2kix.dlg@40tude.net> <20040115171227.GB26860@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <1nq7eb2w5om4b.1g5kxxnyp5cot$.dlg@40tude.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:25:17PM -0500, Scott I. Remick wrote:
> One question: it's not clear from man pkg_glob whether I can combine the
> date format '<2004-01-15' with a package name, so that I only update the
> dependencies of a SPECIFIC package that are older than that date (using -f
> instead of -af of course). Is there a syntax to do that?
portupgrade -rfx '>=3D2004-01-15' foo
will force re-install 'foo' and everything that depends on package
'foo', except those packages installed on or after the given date.
Cheers,
Matthew =20
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFABtAhdtESqEQa7a0RAqGSAJ4qXr40t157teV5me3RufBUOQSlegCfapBw
4vvypcdNvRZXZbLYoQd7EpM=
=rLlX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115173841.GA30502>