Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 00:10:19 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, Dan Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getsetcontext system call Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202090009410.5404-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020209030359.25956A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ptrace doesn't use procfs as it is... On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > To be quite honest, I think that's the right thing to do for now, until > > it is clear what the "right" thing to do is. ptrace(2) isn't going to > > survive KSE unscathed, so perhaps we need an enhanced ptrace interface > > at some point that doesn't suffer from this kind of interface fragility. > > Preferably one that doesn't require procfs, given how hard we've been > trying to eliminate it :-). > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0202090009410.5404-100000>