Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:42:23 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What laptop do you recommend? Message-ID: <441916DF.8010609@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20060315170952.N31320@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <20060313103240.ie1bevcdijs4coko@webmail.meijome.net> <20060314113412.3470fde5@localhost> <20060315102759.G31320@volatile.chemikals.org> <20060316024819.1877a9a8@localhost> <20060315134145.J31320@volatile.chemikals.org> <44188AB9.90708@gmx.de> <20060315170952.N31320@volatile.chemikals.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If you're using nv you don't have 3d acceleration. In your place I would try the nvidia driver from the ports. Your card should outperform my crappy 32MB thing. Wesley Morgan wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> That seems pretty bad. What kind of graphics chip is on that machine? >> I'm using an old Thinkpad R40 with a Radeon Mobility 7500 Chip (rv200) >> and that gives me 2000fps together with a first generation Pentium-M >> 1300. > > It's one of thie NVidia Quadro chips with 128mb ram and up to another > 128 shared. I haven't tried any tweaks at all with the config, the NV > driver doesnt even officially recognize the card, but it does load. > >> >> Wesley Morgan wrote: >>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: >>> >>> I haven't tried any sleep states yet. X runs at the native 1024x768 and >>> glxgears runs at about 760-790 FPS when one of the two cores is occupied >>> with something else and 815 when both are idle. >>> >> >> > [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEGRbffMDIb41/+S0RAqTLAJsG+kX2H9zFGhjDxNV4viTbFZBRiwCbBdyc 7fFnE/VWADBxDJbwnBXYg5c= =CYKd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?441916DF.8010609>