Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:56:27 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi0 problems under latest STABLE Message-ID: <20020311105627.A9391@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20020311182959.9E2863F0E@bast.unixathome.org>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:29:58PM -0500 References: <20020307051444.EBC203F0E@bast.unixathome.org>; <20020306212733.A26094@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020311182959.9E2863F0E@bast.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > I have tried this: > > #define WI_DELAY 100 > #define WI_TIMEOUT (1000000/WI_DELAY) > > I am using a desktop and a laptop, each with wireless cards. The desktop > acts a DHCP server and gateway for the laptop. > > Both machines get the "wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 11; event status 8000" > message. Both have the above settings compiled into the kernel. > > Is there a way I can confirm those settings or adjust them at run time? At this point there isn't. I I'm going to have to rethink handling this problem. It appears that WI_TIMEOUT is actually too long (it hangs the machine for WI_TIMEOUT*WI_DELAY if the command doesn't return). Additionaly, it appears that some cards are just broken and we need to find a way to deal with them. -- Books -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8jP3aXY6L6fI4GtQRAq94AJ4+Hm6B6eBFK8kUEtIvVtFyjKDCqQCfWFKK NDN8vprnzDDK0uNZ0HUqF+0= =Pmks -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311105627.A9391>