Date: 08 Sep 1999 09:49:24 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, sthaug@nethelp.no, madrapour@hotmail.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD Message-ID: <xzpbtbdlu63.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:26:21 -0700" References: <36622.936445305@verdi.nethelp.no> <28018.936617908@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <19990907122621.30662@hydrogen.fircrest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> writes: > no, but we should include a reference to fstat... you can track down > who had a udp socket open, but for some reason the addresses on my 3.0-R > box for tcp streams outputed by netstat don't agree w/ any of the > addresses that exist in the fstat output... I fixed that bug a long time ago. What are you doing still running 3.0-R, anyway? > looks like I should extend the description of -A to include a blurb > about identifing processes which own a socket/stream... Why? What's wrong with sockstat? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbtbdlu63.fsf>