Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 11:08:00 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp bundle.c cbcp.c chap.c command.c fsm.c hdlc.h ip.c ipcp.c ipcp.h link.c link.h lqr.c mp.c pap.c ppp.8 Message-ID: <199909041008.LAA70730@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "04 Sep 1999 09:26:52 %2B0200." <xzpzoz316ir.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > o Add the ``set urgent'' command for adjusting the list of
> > urgent port numbers. The default urgent ports are 21, 22,
> > 23, 513, 514, 543 and 544 (Ports 80 and 81 have been
> > removed from the default priority list).
>
> Ports 53 (DNS) and 123 (NTP) should IMHO be marked as urgent, too. And
> if we care at all about the desktop / home market, throw in ports
> 6667-6669 (IRC) as well.
I think everyone has their own ideas of urgency. The default urgent
ports are interactive (well, not always true for port 22), the idea
being to reduce latency.
I think it would be fine to add a ``set urgent +53 +123 +6667
+6668 +6669'' to the sample file, but POLA says they shouldn't
be the default.
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@FreeBSD.org.uk>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909041008.LAA70730>