Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:28:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> Cc: Jimmy Kelley <ljboiler@gmail.com>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Should lock order reversals be reported? Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1306172023560.26275@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <50278E83-D77F-48B5-8D82-D954ADE1E89A@my.gd> References: <20130617195403.GA43043@jmobile.jimmy.net> <50278E83-D77F-48B5-8D82-D954ADE1E89A@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > +1 to the question, reported 2 a while ago, one for PF and one for FS. > > Gleb quickly fixed the PF one, never had a reply from anyone on FS though. > > I still have it with -CURRENT from last week, can report again. Those FS LORs (from "10-CURRENT r244183 amd64 multiple lock order reversals") look to be well known false positives. E.g., number 285 at http://ipv4.sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html I have seem the other one as well, though it seems to be not in the top 10 (a bit surprising, actually). -Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1306172023560.26275>