Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:32:19 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Are prototypes for main() illegal by any standard ? (was Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.c src/usr.sbin/chown chown.c src/usr.sbin/dev_mkdb dev_mkdb.c Message-ID: <20011214203219.F16945@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20011214102915.L49775@iguana.aciri.org> References: <20011214094310.A25238@dragon.nuxi.com> <200112141803.fBEI3MU02957@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20011214102915.L49775@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:29:15AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Anyways, i think we should not make a big deal out of this. > > Is it illegal, by any standard, to supply prototypes for main() ? > > If not, what is wrong in casually adding them > whenever you happen to touch those files ? > There's nothing with main() prototyping. The other question is IF that prototyping is required. Your reasoning for a commit is wrong; in -CURRENT, -Wmissing-prototypes and -Werror doesn't cause an error if main() is not prototyped. > And the problem is not as widespread as Ruslan suggested. Out of > the 40-50 binaries in my picobsd config, only 3 caused -Werror > to block. > How many from these 40-50 binaries are WARNSified? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011214203219.F16945>