Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:29:47 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:08:20AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>>> How does that compare to 6.2-RELEASE performance? > >>>> > >>> Much better. Fixing filedesc locking was key. > >>> > >>> > >> If there is extra cycles on the same hardware, a performance comparison > >> graph would be great. > > > > See the links in my posting ;) > > I think he means graphs between 6-stable and 7-current - it would be > very nice to see those on the same machine, mysql configuration, etc. > (at the very least to clearly show why people should upgrade :) ). 6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to encourage people to consider upgrading. Krishome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225092947.GA49489>