Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:16:34 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r346958 - head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src Message-ID: <2f77d9f2-833d-f614-e193-a369086c01cf@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <8f360678-2df1-fe7b-cb83-f47923534826@freebsd.org> References: <201904301041.x3UAfLvj054368@repo.freebsd.org> <8f360678-2df1-fe7b-cb83-f47923534826@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/30/19 3:10 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2019-04-30 12:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> Author: hselasky >> Date: Tue Apr 30 10:41:20 2019 >> New Revision: 346958 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346958 >> >> Log: >> Reduce the number of mutexes after r346645 in the LinuxKPI. >> Make function macro wrappers for locking and unlocking to ease >> readability. >> No functional change. >> Discussed with: kib@, tychon@ and zeising@ > > I was not part of any discussion regarding this. If this is related to > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20097 I explicitly asked you on gitter to > hold of for a bit, while we try to figure out why we are seeing > regressions in graphics with the latest dmar changes. > > Can you please revert this since it colludes the dmar graphics issue, > and it makes the suggested patch not apply cleanly, which makes it > harder to get people to help test. > Thank you! > Regards In response to your request I've collected fixes for all the known LinuxKPI+DMA issues at: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20097 It is based on top of the latest -current. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2f77d9f2-833d-f614-e193-a369086c01cf>