Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:12:10 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990110130754.21293A-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <50343.915957694@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > 2. Let the committers vote these sorts of technical decisions since we > can both get a much better "turnout" from committers on an issue > (when we're lucky to get even half of core to vote sometimes) and > we also involve most those who generally end up doing most of the > work. Fair is fair, right? Some sort of automatic means of voting would be nice. Committers all have the means to be authenticated and vote (freefall), and certainly more positions are going to be reprsented, such as people working on small kernels and such, alpha people, ports, etc.. I'd hate for us to have 50 committees and respective chairpeople, and a committer vote would be nice. Perhaps an existing system (a cvs file that people modify?) could be used to track these votes. All just ideas flowing through my mind, comments please.. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990110130754.21293A-100000>