Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:37:08 +0100 (CET) From: Claus Guttesen <cguttesen@yahoo.dk> To: Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com>, amd64@freebsd.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel EMT64 Xeon vs AMD Opteron Message-ID: <20050204103708.21608.qmail@web26801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c50a3c$50f2eba0$6800000a@r3140ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost > as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But > how do they compare performance wise; specifically > related to FreeBSD? We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual opteron @ 2 GHz, both with 4 GB RAM and running the amd64-port. My impression is that the opteron performs *slightly* better than it's Intel-cousin. regards Claus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050204103708.21608.qmail>