Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 18:58:53 +0200 From: Cynic <cynic@mail.cz> To: "Jason Dodson" <HaxCode4u@home.com>, <freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Win2k then FreeBSD Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010805185532.01e99878@mail.cz> In-Reply-To: <002301c11dce$00b2c970$a3faf818@ci744227a>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NT should not wipe out your MBR. win9x does it, but not NT AFAIK.
anyway, (not that I have any experience with dualbooting NT and
FreeBSD) the recommended practice is to install windows first,
FreeBSD after that.
It is my understanding that the most common practice is what you
describe (i. e. using the FreeBSD boot manager to switch between
OS's.
do you plan to install each system on a separate disk, or on one
disk (different partitions)?
At 18:45 8/5/2001, Jason Dodson wrote the following:
--------------------------------------------------------------
>Ok, about to just wipe off my 4 hard drives and start fresh.....
>
>It is best to install FreeBSD with BootManager on whatever drive on want then to install Win2k? correct?
>
>Just checking....I know that Win2k writes over the MBR but is it possible to install Win2k first then install FreeBSD? and just use the FreeBSD bootmanager for both OS's?
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Jason
>
>
>HaxCode4u@home.com
------end of quote------
cynic@mail.cz
-------------
And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20010805185532.01e99878>