Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:33:52 +0200 From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> To: bcr@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/140369: [patch] src/contrib/pf/man/pf.4 Message-ID: <4DDA5430.6070306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201105231133.p4NBXtfb082468@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201105231133.p4NBXtfb082468@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-05-23 13:33, bcr@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] src/contrib/pf/man/pf.4 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: bcr > State-Changed-When: Mon May 23 11:29:31 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > The proposed fix is included in OpenBSD's pf man page. > It will be available in FreeBSD once we import their > latest version that also includes that man page. Close > this PR, knowing full well that it might take some time > before this fix will be available in FreeBSD as well. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140369 Hm, whats the reason to not fix simple manpage? The API is implemented in FreeBSD and I have used DIOCKILLSTATES for example in the snortsam ssp_pf2.c module. The OpenBSD documentation is really good, but even the older one does not match the FreeBSD implementation in some places. I guess the next 7.x/ 8.x release will not include a never pf version, so why not fix existing documentation? Anyway thanks for looking into this Regards, olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DDA5430.6070306>