Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:04:07 +0000 () From: Victor Rotanov <vitjok@fasts.com> To: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961217110236.16720A-100000@server.fasts.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961217005838.1244A-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Victor Rotanov wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > > Why sendmail can't be replaced with something more secure by default? > > I'd suggest Zmailer which can be fount at > > ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer > > It is also seems to be faster than sendmail on high loads. > > Oh god, don't get the religious wars going again, *please*. why? anything is more secure than sendmail, and zmailer is used on highly loaded mail servers. > > Ben > > The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation > Board of Queensland, Australia. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.961217110236.16720A-100000>