Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:27:17 +0100 From: Peo Nilsson <per-olof.nilsson@comhem.se> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: FreeBSD quest-list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnupg keysize Message-ID: <1195162037.1436.25.camel@zeus.se> In-Reply-To: <44oddvtmvu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1195144649.48014.4.camel@zeus.se> <44oddvtmvu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 12:54 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Peo Nilsson <per-olof.nilsson@comhem.se> writes: > No one is forcing you to follow standards. > However, standards are useful when communicating with other people. I agree. When it comes to algoritms used and the functionality that is offered. The size of the keys have nothing to do with that. People are already using different sizes of their keys. -- /Peo ---------------------------------------------- - PGP signed/encrypted emails is prefered - ---------------------------------------------- [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHPLmxgWSfflYlIbwRAjQcAKDPRtWGgxuBHo/TvijQJBje7jTQ1QCg6x+y uMWoVVDRGuors4oQTaXzuHE= =Fw/M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1195162037.1436.25.camel>