Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:50:10 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Denis Barov <dindin@yandex-team.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4 Message-ID: <20071108055010.GA62962@heff.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <473297D0.6010705@FreeBSD.org> References: <20071107182928.GA66533@sepulcator.local.yandex.ru> <473297D0.6010705@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Denis Barov wrote:
>> Hi all!
>> I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken:
>> BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2
>> but, it's not really so. It's broken after Wed Jul 11 21:25:48 2007 UTC
>> commit by
>> thompsa@freebsd.org, when some ioctls was deleted from kernel.
>> For example, after patching /usr/include/dev/wi/if_wavelan_ieee.h
>> bsd-airtools compiled well:
>> --- /usr/include/dev/wi/if_wavelan_ieee.h 2007-11-07
>> 19:36:15.000000000 +0300
>> +++ /usr/src/sys/dev/wi/if_wavelan_ieee.h 2007-07-12
>> 01:25:48.000000000 +0400
>> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
>> */
>> #define WI_MAX_DATALEN 512
>> -#if 1
>> +#if 0
>> struct wi_req {
>> u_int16_t wi_len;
>> u_int16_t wi_type;
>> But, still missing some ioctls. dstumbler said
>> error: unable to ioctl device socket: Invalid argument
>> May be I can do something helpful?
>
> I guess you should back not just these header definitions but ioctl
> implementations too. Or ask thompsa if you could use something instead.
The net80211 system supports the IEEE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ and
IEEE80211_IOC_SCAN_RESULTS ioctls which work on _all_ wireless
interfaces. These have been present since 6.0 and the above wi(4)
specific interface have been removed as the driver has been brought into
line.
cheers,
Andrew
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071108055010.GA62962>