Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:50:26 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: vd@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c Message-ID: <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:18:50PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Vasil Dimov wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:51:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>>> sobomax 2006-11-03 03:51:40 UTC >>> [...] >>>> Added files: >>>> devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c >>> Aargh :-/ >>> I thought we were supposed to use Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new >>> patches. >> Why so? We have Tools/scripts/patchtool.py for the few years now. > > The note I made was about the convention, not the exact tool used. You > should read: > > "I thought we were supposed to use the convention used by > Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new patches." Who those "we" are and why exactly they should use that "convention"? Is it official or what? -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454AE6B2.70702>