Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:58:49 +0300 From: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> To: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>, chukharev@mail.ru, "freebsd-qa@freebsd.org" <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: About ports QA by 'port test' Message-ID: <3cb459ed1003170558s45d0d7bcv96094f28efb68a24@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100316134607.GA3204@straylight.ringlet.net> References: <op.u89g6dh3mhpy7y@vova-vaio> <3cb459ed1003160605x2eb9fe76h28ba8bdc35f9f3c@mail.gmail.com> <20100316134607.GA3204@straylight.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Folks, If the portlint would be told to ignore errors like missing PORTVERSION, then how do you know whether the port is correct or not? >From my point of view, the issue is the portlint pretends to parse makefiles, but does not implement full make :-). For example, as far as I understand, the line 2188 just verifies that the file has a line starting with PORTVERSION. Portlint should use "make -V PORTVERSION" instead. Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3cb459ed1003170558s45d0d7bcv96094f28efb68a24>