Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:23:06 +1000 From: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd daemon chick wallpaper?? Message-ID: <20030619062306.D96512@welearn.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3EF0A71E.648498C8@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:53:34AM -0700 References: <3EF061D9.7000609@potentialtech.com> <20030618165119.GA31988@rfc822.net> <20030618173637.GB32151@rfc822.net> <3EF0A71E.648498C8@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:53:34AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Pete Ehlke wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > confused by pointers doesn't mean she can't write useful code. I mean, many
> > > of the high-level languages don't even use pointers, right?
> >
> > I've heard this, as well. I don't trust any of them.
>
> They use pointers.
>
> They just don't let *you* use pointers.
>
> Mostly because their smarmy designers believe they are smarter
> than all their users -- after all, if you were smart enough to
> use pointers, you would have written your own high level language
> that doesn't permit people less intelligent than you to use
> pointers and thus screw up software you might want to run some
> day...
Typical, one track mind :-) Within minutes the facade drops and
their basic animal instincts for code take over. They can't help it,
you can't fight it. That's why BSD women are more attractive
than others. It's the only way the species was able survive.
--
Regards,
-*Sue*-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030619062306.D96512>