Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:50:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Rob DeMarco <r.p.demarco@att.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20041202045027.GA43428@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041202044145.80CCB43D39@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:41:44AM +0000, Rob DeMarco wrote: > Thanks for the info. The thing that got my attention was how, > after enough processes were spawned and (presumably, some of the cache > could have been used before needing to page) the 10M remained for use for > the "Buf" only -- or at least it seemed like it according to `top'. > But maybe I'm misreading that (I seemed to remember reading that > the "Wired" info always included the "Buf") But then I am > definitely way out of my league here. I can't even make sense out > of the SIZE / RES columns, neither which seem to add up to the actual > memory/swap used. It's just a count of the amount of memory currently in use, not a fixed amount assigned to different uses. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBrp8TWry0BWjoQKURAliqAJ4gL0T5mZnoWSgAo/LHzdata+ZqBACfVfOH 9hM0PfI+3de+Zfcf+LEo+7I= =En67 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041202045027.GA43428>