Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:21:30 +0700 (ICT)
From:      Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bacula vs. Amanda vs. whatever ...
Message-ID:  <200512090221.jB92LUNV013191@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
In-Reply-To: <20051208224447.GA23802@mach.bobleeit.net>
References:  <000a01c60cb3$8aac6130$2401a8c0@XGISH> <20051208224447.GA23802@mach.bobleeit.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have a home network with two FreeBSD servers (web- and file-server), a =
> number of Windows desktops and a wireless FreeBSD laptop all connected to o=
> ne another using Samba.=20

Advantage of Amanda, if I understand well, is that you don't need to
install anything on your Windows machines.

I have been using Amanda to backup various Unixes and Windows for
years now and it is very satisfactory.

I even wrote some web interface so that Windows user could add some
shares to back-up, without any sys admin help. OK that bit has not
been tested with XP...

Olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512090221.jB92LUNV013191>